Comments on: Rally for civil unions http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/2009/11/10/rally-for-civil-unions/18048 Australia's leading gay and lesbian news source Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:02:20 +1100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Gay activist Paul Mitchell http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/2009/11/10/rally-for-civil-unions/18048/comment-page-1#comment-17878 Gay activist Paul Mitchell Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:33:45 +0000 http://www.starobserver.com.au/?p=18048#comment-17878 If Kevin Rudd does veto the ACT law just recently passed – I will completely veto my support for him because quite frankly “he is running on very thin ice” when it comes to support from gay men and lesbians who did vote for him in November 2007 and I and millions of other gays will defiantly take vote in November 2010 to the Greens! Back in 2007 I did support Kevin Rudd taking on and challenging John Howard on family law, transport road linkages, regional development, Government grants and agricultural reforms that Howard neglected in the 11 years in office. Last time I looked at us as Australians, we take our pride very seriously and are a proud secular society in 2009. Kevin Rudd has got no guts or balls to talk openly and positively on gay marriage and have his views but he has no right to have a say that is bigoted in a strong democracy where 60 percent support gay marriages – however he has NO RIGHT to shove those bigoted “union of a man and woman marriage views” down everyone’s throats like a deep throat at a sleaze ball party. He is like a show-pony that "pretends" to recognize his integrity - but his own credibility is lacking and wasted away up shit creek without a paddle! The only marriage Kevin Rudd "the dud" should be concentrating on is his own marriage with that stupid fat bitch - and not be a show-puppet bigot of the Australian Christian Lobby (someone had to say it)! But then again Kevin Rudd will probably get caught by the police when he is in the middle of have sex in a Sydney Airport toilet cubical with another male and say that he is not gay – just like US Senator Larry Craig did back in 2007! I rest my case. Independent Gay Activist Paul Mitchell. If Kevin Rudd does veto the ACT law just recently passed – I will completely veto my support for him because quite frankly “he is running on very thin ice” when it comes to support from gay men and lesbians who did vote for him in November 2007 and I and millions of other gays will defiantly take vote in November 2010 to the Greens! Back in 2007 I did support Kevin Rudd taking on and challenging John Howard on family law, transport road linkages, regional development, Government grants and agricultural reforms that Howard neglected in the 11 years in office.

Last time I looked at us as Australians, we take our pride very seriously and are a proud secular society in 2009. Kevin Rudd has got no guts or balls to talk openly and positively on gay marriage and have his views but he has no right to have a say that is bigoted in a strong democracy where 60 percent support gay marriages – however he has NO RIGHT to shove those bigoted “union of a man and woman marriage views” down everyone’s throats like a deep throat at a sleaze ball party. He is like a show-pony that “pretends” to recognize his integrity – but his own credibility is lacking and wasted away up shit creek without a paddle!

The only marriage Kevin Rudd “the dud” should be concentrating on is his own marriage with that stupid fat bitch – and not be a show-puppet bigot of the Australian Christian Lobby (someone had to say it)! But then again Kevin Rudd will probably get caught by the police when he is in the middle of have sex in a Sydney Airport toilet cubical with another male and say that he is not gay – just like US Senator Larry Craig did back in 2007!
I rest my case.

Independent Gay Activist Paul Mitchell.

]]> By: Tony http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/2009/11/10/rally-for-civil-unions/18048/comment-page-1#comment-17822 Tony Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:44:15 +0000 http://www.starobserver.com.au/?p=18048#comment-17822 The bill was passed in the ACT today. It's not marriage, it's not recognised federally, but it's a step in the right direction. However, don't pop your champagne corks yet. There's a danger that Kev the Hev, defender of the "sanctity of marriage" (What IS that?) will shove them back in the bottle. The bill was passed in the ACT today. It’s not marriage, it’s not recognised federally, but it’s a step in the right direction. However, don’t pop your champagne corks yet. There’s a danger that Kev the Hev, defender of the “sanctity of marriage” (What IS that?) will shove them back in the bottle.

]]>