Dentist forms dumped

Dentist forms dumped

Outdated patient forms implying children of gay and bisexual men were a risk group for HIV and Hepatitis have been removed from a South Australian dental practice following a Southern Star investigation.
Adelaide woman Helen Alexander got a shock on a recent visit to dentists, Teeth For Life.
“I was an existing patient, but when I went in for my appointment they said it had come up that they didn’t have a particular form for me on file,” Alexander told the Star.
“Filling it in, the first side I was happy with but then I turned it over and I was really unhappy with what I saw.”
On the back was a question on HIV and Hepatitis risk groups, which it listed as “users of intravenous drugs, recipients of blood or blood products, homosexuals and bisexuals [and] sexual partners and children of any of the above groups”.
“I thought asking whether you were bisexual or homosexual was inappropriate, but I was even more disturbed by the question which asked if you were the partner, and especially the child, of someone who is homosexual or bisexual,” Alexander said.
“I’m not in either of those situations but I have a lot of friends who are gay and I thought immediately I should try to do something about this.”
Staff allowed Helen to make a copy of the form and she contacted the Star. She has since spoken with her dentist who took the issue to Teeth For Life’s head of practice Dr Graham Parry.
Parry said an employee had downloaded the forms from the internet when the practice had run out of patient information forms last year.
“These were forms that contained questions that were probably standard 15 or 20 years ago, but the scientific understanding of these issues has moved on and those questions are no longer necessary,” Parry said.
Alexander was the first person to complain and Teeth For Life has since removed all outdated forms from use.
“I’m happy with the action that Teeth For Life has taken, but I understand similar forms may be being used by other dental surgeries and that’s not acceptable — people should realise by now that this is not how these things are transmitted.”
The Star has identified another dentist in Western Australia using forms with an identical question.
Australian Dental Association CEO Robert Boyd-Boland said these instances were the first to be drawn to his attention and he believed them to be isolated.
“Information sheets such as these contravene the ethos of the ADA and do little to protect either the patient or staff,” Boyd-Boland said.
“Where children of such people are concerned this question is inappropriate … the correct patient questionnaire should ask if someone has been tested for HIV, Hepatitis C and if so was the result positive.
“The reason the information should be sought has to do with protecting a patient infected by HIV or Hepatitis C from provision of dental treatment at an adverse time. During treatment for Hepatitis C immune levels can drop significantly, platelets can plummet and dental treatment can cause that patient to end up with a nasty infection at a very bad time.
“Knowing a patient has HIV allows the dentist to provide better care, especially if they have had or do have HIV-related oral issues such as severe periodontal disease or warts.”
Dr Parry said he would not be surprised if other practices could be using forms with outdated language.
“We would like to see the Australian Dental Association send a circular around to members on this issue and make more formal advice available,” he said.

You May Also Like

2 responses to “Dentist forms dumped”

  1. I’ve lied for years about this issue on dental forms, not because I have HIV or Hep C or whatever, but because it was a gross invasion of my privacy and offensive that I should have to disclose my sexuality, which is irrelevant. I always felt that it was none of their business, especially since all health care professionals should be practicing universal infection control procedures regardless of a patient’s known or unknown status in regard to various infectious diseases. Such forms are still in circulation in Victoria, or at least they were the last time I went to a dentist about 18 months ago.

  2. Bullshit Dr Parry! We new 15 and 20 years ago that was bullshit. People took legal action against Dentist to stop such forms, as some Dentist were using this to charge higher fees with no evidence for such claims.

    Perhaps you might explain why you as the head of the practice do not seem to read your own forms that others are expected to sign?

    I think all this can summed up in one word. Discrimination.