<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New High Court Chief Justice announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starobserver.com.au/soap-box/2008/08/06/new-high-court-chief-justice-announced/1050/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starobserver.com.au/soap-box/2008/08/06/new-high-court-chief-justice-announced/1050</link>
	<description>Australia&#039;s leading gay and lesbian news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:28:30 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://www.starobserver.com.au/soap-box/2008/08/06/new-high-court-chief-justice-announced/1050/comment-page-1#comment-13772</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starobserver.com.au/?p=1050#comment-13772</guid>
		<description>The notion that no interpretative exercise can be entirely -œobjective is like saying &#039;no science can be entirely objective&#039;. Is his job not to ensure it is. Is not policy supposed to be consonant with the facts of reality, and in so doing, be be internally consistent? 
Is the judge saying reality has contradictions or that he reserves the right to retain contradictions. Or is policy supposed to be somebody&#039;s wet dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion that no interpretative exercise can be entirely -œobjective is like saying &#8216;no science can be entirely objective&#8217;. Is his job not to ensure it is. Is not policy supposed to be consonant with the facts of reality, and in so doing, be be internally consistent?<br />
Is the judge saying reality has contradictions or that he reserves the right to retain contradictions. Or is policy supposed to be somebody&#8217;s wet dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.starobserver.com.au/soap-box/2008/08/06/new-high-court-chief-justice-announced/1050/comment-page-1#comment-10377</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starobserver.com.au/?p=1050#comment-10377</guid>
		<description>She is fantastic for Australia and us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is fantastic for Australia and us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
