UN approves gay rights resolution

UN approves gay rights resolution

The United Nations Human Rights Council has approved a gay rights resolution calling for no discrimination and violence on people regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.

The resolution, to be moved by South Africa, recalls the universality of human rights, and notes concern about acts of violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

It requested the High Commissioner for Human Rights prepare a study on violence and discrimination on these grounds, and called for a panel discussion to be held at the Human Rights Council to discuss the findings of the study in a constructive and transparent manner.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton called the resolution’s passage a “historic moment”.

“All over the world, people face human rights abuses and violations because of their sexual orientation or gender identity, including torture, rape, criminal sanctions, and killing. Today’s landmark resolution affirms that human rights are universal,” Clinton said in a statement.

The resolution did not seek to create new rights but simply affirms the application of existing human rights standards to those who face human rights violations because they are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender, and called for further information and dialogue on discrimination and violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

The resolution was adopted by the U.N. Human Rights Council, 23 to 19. Three countries, including China, abstained from the vote.

It marked the first time a U.N. body has backed the rights of gay, lesbian and transgendered people.

It expressed “grave concern at acts of violence and discrimination, in all regions of the world, committed against individuals because of their sexual orientation and gender identity”.

Speaking on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, Shafqat Ali Khan of Pakistan said before the vote that the conference was concerned the Council was discussing controversial notions of sexual orientation.

“We are seriously concerned at the attempt to introduce to the United Nations some notions that have no legal foundation in any international human rights instrument.”

Nigeria representative Ositadinma Anaedu criticised South Africa for breaking ranks with African countries, claiming more than 90 percent of the African people did not support this resolution.

The following is the text of the resolution:

Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity
The Human Rights Council

Recalling the universality, interdependence, indivisibility and interrelatedness of human rights as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and consequently elaborated in other human rights instruments, such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other relevant core human rights instruments,

Recallling also that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights and that everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in that Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth, or other status;

Recalling further General Assembly resolution 60/251 of 15 March 2006, in which the Assembly stated that the Human Rights Council should be responsible for promoting universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction of any kind and in fair and equal manner,

Expressing grave concern at acts of violence and discrimination, in all regions of the world, committed against individuals because of their sexual orientation and gender identity

1. Requests the High Commissioner to commission a study to be finalized by December 2011, to document discriminatory laws and practices and acts of violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity, in all regions of the world, and how international human rights law can be used to end violence and related human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity;

2. Decides to convene a panel discussion during the 19th session of the Human Rights Council, informed by the facts contained in the study commissioned by the High Commissioner and to have constructive, informed and transparent dialogue on the issue of discriminatory laws and practices and acts of violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity;

3. Decides also that the panel will also discuss the appropriate follow-up to the recommendations of the study commissioned by the High Commissioner;

4. Decides to remain seized of this priority issue.

You May Also Like

4 responses to “UN approves gay rights resolution”

  1. @Bruno HRUST. .. the UN also affords you the right to an education, may I suggest you avail yourself of that right before continuign to post your ignorant views here.

  2. It is not so much a red banner day as a rainbow flag moment. Gays the world over should not be discriminated against, so says the United Nations in an historic moment, adopting a resolution supporting equal rights for gays. Did you hear that “Faggot” slurring sports stars and, yes, I am talking to you Tracey Morgan for whom this must be a bit of a ‘stab in the heart’. But it is not just the law of the land; it is the understanding of the world. So if the United Nations can understand and facilitate such understanding…what is still wrong with this united nation known as the United States? Just how can we stand by the UN resolution without fully understanding the hypocrisy that still permeates this United…or not so united…States. We still have discrimination in the armed forces. (Sure, sure, committee after committee has to still weigh in on the ridding of DADT. Until then where are we?) Gay Weddings? Good for some in some states…intolerable to others in most states. This is simple discrimination. Let us learn from the resolution and have some truth in advertising for once. If we want to call ourselves the United States…can’t we just be United? Really!?!

  3. It is all alright for everyone to have every right under the sun; but in reality, all that is unnatural is very costly. Civilizations have collapsed under the burden of unnutural rights, where they could not be maintained naturally, bu Mother Nature, and would not by people. This resolution is another nail, of too many from the OUN, that hit the coffin of this civiliyation. How will be treated those individuals who do not want to have any business with any gay person or society? Do really people have to give up their natural rights, just to satisfy some resolution?