

Think about young men in suits on lunch from their swish new banking job talking about all the hot chicks they’ve banged recently, or about drunk bogans in a pub talking about all the fights they got into on the weekend. Sure, these examples are extreme (albeit common), but an experience on the tram the other day made me realise that even if there isn’t any misogyny, racism, homophobia or violence involved, I seem to have reached a point where the abstract idea of a group of heterosexual men socialising is enough for me to dislike them.
On my way home from work, I found myself eavesdropping on a nearby group of friends. There were about five guys, all probably in their early 20s and, from what I could gather, probably living at one of the University of Melbourne residential colleges. One in particular was clearly holding court, a tall guy with long hair and a shirt unbuttoned to his navel.
From his clothes and his posh accent I’d guess he was a private school kid who, upon arriving at university, had blossomed in the role of his group’s ‘alternative guy’. He spent much of the tram ride explaining why his friends should be listening to Edith Piaf, singing excerpts in French.
Although irritating and pretentious, the whole thing was pretty innocuous, so it took me a little while to pinpoint why I felt so repulsed, then I understood. When inhabiting public spaces, as a gay man I am often aware of my own self-conception as an outsider in a space made for other people. This is reinforced by specific things in those spaces – hetero-targeted advertising, hetero couples doing couple-y stuff, hearing people say ‘that’s so gay’ – but it has also become largely internalised.
Groups of heterosexual men don’t have to assert their status, we live in a society that does it for them. Seeing Piaf guy on the tram reminded me that any assertion of authority (in this case, an assertion of cultural credibility) by such a group is grotesque because it is so unnecessary.
This example highlights that it needn’t be a group of drunk footy fans, these assertions are just as present in the everyday. This may seem unfair, but in the face of the queer struggle for any kind of social legitimacy, I can’t see them as anything other than public masturbation.
Follow Ben Riley on Twitter: @bencriley
Support the Star Observer… while you still can
LGBTQIA+ media is under threat. Queer content is censored by tech conglomerates who amplify bigotry and push out AI slop — so we receive less financial support than ever.
When our community is muzzled and intolerance intensifies, we need queer media more than ever. Your donation means we can continue paying queer journalists to write queer news.
Don’t rely on the straight lies of big tech – support Star Observer instead and donate now.

