Hate crime sentence to be appealed

Hate crime sentence to be appealed

Victoria Police may appeal a three-month suspended sentence handed to a Melbourne man for his part in a violent gay bashing on Sydney Rd last year.

The man, Billal Ali, was also fined $1500 and placed on a 12-month community-based order for the brutal attack which left a gay couple with bruising, cuts and one victim with post-traumatic stress disorder.

The incident occurred at 9.30pm on Christmas night 2010 when Ali and his cousin Houssain El Halabi, from a car, approached the two men who were holding hands.

Ali and El Halabi hurled homophobic abuse at the couple and Ali threw a bottle at the head of one of the victims before the two offenders set upon the pair, chasing them down and viciously kicking and punching them.

Two of Ali’s brothers, Haydar and Barry, later arrived at the scene and joined in the attack.

The three Ali brothers were sentenced in the Sunshine Magistrates’ Court on Monday.

Haydar Ali received a 12-month community-based order and was fined $1500 for his part in the attack.

Barry Ali was fined $1500.

In 2009 Victorian sentencing laws were amended to require judges to take into account crime motivated by hate or prejudice when handing down a sentence.

Magistrate Peter Mellas told the court he was satisfied, given the evidence, the victims had come to Billal Ali’s attention because of their sexual orientation.

However, in sentencing Haydar and Barry Ali, Mellas said he could not prove beyond reasonable doubt the pair were specifically motivated by prejudice in the attack.

Mellas rejected Billal Ali’s use of steroids, said to have given him ‘roid rage’, as an excuse for the attack.

El Halabi did not show up at the court for sentencing and a warrant for his arrest was issued.

Victoria Police prosecutor Danielle Pastoors said an appeal will be lodged with the Office of Police Prosecutions (OPP) in the coming days to challenge the leniency of the sentence in line with changes to Victoria’s hate-crime sentencing laws.

Victoria Police launched its first-ever strategy to combat prejudice-motivated crime earlier this year to train police to better respond to hate-motivated crime.

The case is thought to be one of the first to test the state’s new sentencing laws on homophobic-motivated crime.

Anti-Violence Project Victoria convenor Greg Adkins told the Star Observer the outcome of the case does not clearly demonstrate that changes to sentencing laws are having an effect.

“It may take this case moving to a higher court before the gay and lesbian community can see the evidence that the prejudice motivation provision in sentencing is truly in operation,” he said.

You May Also Like

8 responses to “Hate crime sentence to be appealed”

  1. What a lot of crap! they were targeted by these creeps. What a cop out. At least the police for a change see thats an injustice

  2. […] Hate crime sentence to be appealed Victoria Police prosecutor Danielle Pastoors said an appeal will be lodged with the Office of Police Prosecutions (OPP) in the coming days to challenge the leniency of the sentence in line with changes to Victoria's hate-crime sentencing laws. … Read more on Sydney Star Observer […]

  3. Oh dear at the chance of going ahead of this it may well be claimed due to styles of Ethnic names associated here that race and belief methodology was the initial causation factor; then male-dom force took over. The law must deal and I support Vic Police to have this dealt with at a higher judicial level so no one ever gets this again. If you did this in Nigeria, you would be shot on the spot; no questions asked. Treat scum like scum; sadly that is all they know.

  4. We’re just too lenient on this type of violence in general. It won’t be surprising if we end up seeing behaviour like we recently saw in the UK riots. This type walk out of court laughing. We need to get serious on violent crime.

  5. […] That’s the trouble when the judiciary is totally clueless about Islamic doctrine: Magistrate Peter Mellas told the court the victims had come to Billal Ali’s attention because of their sexual orientation.  However, in sentencing Haydar and Barry Ali, Mellas said he could not prove beyond reasonable doubt the pair were specifically motivated by prejudice in the attack.  (I hope Justice Kirby is reading this) […]

  6. I think regardless of the motivation, this type of crime is abhorrent and should be met with a much stricter punishment.