Marriage equality suffers Senate setback

Marriage equality suffers Senate setback

A SYDNEY lesbian couple who married under British law last week have said they are deeply disappointed at the conclusions of a Senate report that dashed hopes their marriage would be recognised in Australia.

Shirleene Robinson, an academic at Macquarie University, married her fiancé Sarah Midgley, a British citizen — at the UK’s consulate in Sydney last Friday, September 26 (pictured above).

The day before, the Senate’s Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee recommended that a bill introduced by Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, which sought to recognise the marriages of Australian same-sex couples who had legally wed overseas, not be passed.

“It is deeply disappointing that Australians can expect greater respect and recognition from foreign governments than from our own,” Robinson said.

“We would love to have our solemn vows recognised under Australian law.”

In its report, the Senate committee accused equality campaigners of seeing any law change as a step on the road towards full same sex marriage.

“Marriage equality is an issue that should be addressed honestly and directly in the context of wider debate, not through attempts to address the issue incrementally,” it read.

The report also said couples not in a position to be married overseas would be discriminated against and the issue of marriage equality had been debated and rejected several times in parliament in recent years.

Organisations who argued against recognising overseas same sex marriages included the Australian Christian Lobby, the Federal Attorney-General’s Department and the Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney

Australian Marriage Equality national director Rodney Croome said the committee dwelt on issues such as religious freedoms and the so-called “slippery slope” while ignoring the personal stories of Australian same-sex couples married under foreign laws.

“The Senate report is a slap in the face to the hundreds of loving, committed Australian couples who have married overseas,” he said.

“This one-sided report highlights why it is important for Coalition members to be allowed a free vote on marriage equality and are no longer tied to automatically opposing it.

“I don’t understand how anyone who says they respect the institution of marriage can turn around and support the invalidation of existing legal marriages.”

At the 2011 Census more than 1300 gay couples said they were married overseas while around 240 Australian same sex couples have married in New Zealand.

None of these marriages are recognised in Australia when the couples return home.

(Photo credit: Same Love Photography)

You May Also Like

7 responses to “Marriage equality suffers Senate setback”

  1. I agree with my friend in Forbes, what a total joke Australia is with being behind the times on the marriage equality bill!

    What an embarrassment!

    Come on Australia time for equality – New Zealand, South Africa, Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, New Caledonia, Canada, France, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Luxembourg, Sweden, Norway, United Kingdom and lots of states within both the United States and Mexico have legally allowed marriage equality and gone and done it – why not Australia?

    What is Australia’s excuse?… Correct – There is no excuse!

  2. Australia is the land of the 2004 “Straight Australia Marriage Policy”!

    I am deeply ashamed and embarrassed to be Australian; all because of this government (both Labor and Liberal) are committed to keeping an old and dusty 1961 marriage law!

  3. What a fucking joke. Bill Shorten and Tony Abbott have no problem committing Australia to an open ended war costing a whopping 100 billion, helping countries like Saudi Arabia, who cut our heads off, but panic a gay couple might be recognised in Australian law. The Catholic Church is yet to identify where all the children bodies are who where killed in their orphanages, so it astonishing the Labor and LNP parties would take orders from the Catholic Church. The fanatical Christian lobby says homosexuality is worse then smoking, and is a cancer, why be guided by this divisive cult?