WYD regulations ruled invalid

WYD regulations ruled invalid

Readers may recall that the Star legal column in last week’s edition looked at the farce which was the World Youth Day Regulations 2008. Since then two activists involved with the No to Pope Coalition lodged a constitutional challenge to the regulations. In a much anticipated decision, the full Federal Court in Evans v State of NSW found the regulations invalid to the extent they purported to give certain persons the authority to issue fines for behaviour which is causing annoyance or inconvenience to a participant at a World Youth Day event.
The applications lodged with the Federal Court sought orders to the effect that the regulations were invalid. The orders were sought on two bases. Firstly, that the laws impermissibly infringed the implied right to freedom of political communication found to exist in the Australian Constitution. The second ground of appeal was that the regulations exceeded the regulation-making power contained in the World Youth Day Act 2006 (WYD Act).
In the absence of an explicit right to free speech in the Constitution, the Australian Courts have understood the implied right to freedom of political communication quite narrowly. Unsurprisingly, the full Federal Court shied away from making a constitutional finding on this matter, instead finding the regulations had exceeded the regulation-making power contained in the WYD Act.
While the decision of the Court to invalidate the WYD Regulations is welcome, Parliament can rectify this embarrassing situation in the future by passing more carefully drafted legislation which expressly allows the Executive to promulgate equally draconian regulations. A finding of constitutional invalidity (although likely to have been appealed to the High Court) would have sent a stronger message to the hapless Iemma Government that the Courts won’t tolerate measures that infringe on basic democratic rights.
Cases such as this highlight the need to consider either a Constitutional or statutory Bill of Rights. Australia remains one of the very few respected liberal democracies around the world which has not moved to entrench these basis democratic rights. We can no longer rely upon our politicians (and certainly not the NSW Labor Party) to set aside short-term interest to uphold the values of democracy.

One response to “WYD regulations ruled invalid”

  1. One thing people must understand is that,
    It does not matter if or when a bill of rights is ever made and put in place, because the Australian Constitution itself is entirely invalid. therefore the implications of this means this is why we find politicians more and more corrupt. If you do more study into the Constitution you will realize just how much of a farce it has been for over 200 years.

    We have laws for example that prohibit the anyone from interfering with someones political liberties, yet we see backbenchers and companies interfere with how politicians vote all the time, just look up section 28 of the crimes act of 1914 pertaining to political liberties.

    what does this mean? well i would suggest you get to know common law, common laws override statute law even though the gov would try to make you believe otherwise, I would also suggest that you look up things on the net.. youtube for example and search for Mark Mcurtrie and invalid constitution and so forth..

    Cheers

    Ps, you might just be surprised how much of your rights are trying to be taken away