This week, the Star Observer‘s opinion pieces looks at the 2014 Federal Budget and how it impacts on the LGBTI community. Yesterday, we heard from National LGBTI Health Alliance executive director Rebecca Reynolds on at-risk groups caught in the dramatic changes to Centrelink. She returns today to raise questions about the almost $250 million spend on the school chaplaincy program.
SHOULD we be worried about the impending changes to the school chaplaincy program that restricts workers to those endorsed by church communities?
And there is no homogenous character to “the church”. There are churches and religions within Australia that celebrate LGBTI peoples and communities in every aspect of church life. There are many that do not, they remain committed to their traditions and values about sexuality and gender that are at odds with Australian law and culture in 2014.
Without the option of secular support workers in schools, what values will the chaplains reflect? Will they reflect the full spectrum of the church’s teaching on sexuality and gender, or simply their own church’s values, or their own values even at odds with their church? And how will we know? Okay, values don’t exist in a vacuum, nothing is”‘values free”. But for young people questioning their place in the world, navigating new feelings and concepts, guidance provided free of condemnatory overtones is essential.
This is the heart and soul of harm-minimisation. It is also important to note that our government schools are supposed to be secular and imposing “Christian” ideals on a young person who is already vulnerable erodes this important characteristic of our democracy.
Writing Themselves in 3, tells us that “young people who are involved in religion in Australia are often forced to negotiate their sexuality within the confines of a belief system that threatens an eternity in ‘hell’ for the feelings they experience as unavoidable.” The impact of this, is often catastrophic. Increased rates of self-harm, drug and alcohol misuse and suicide are among the most significant impacts we can see, but with this comes an increased need for services outside of the school setting to assist with negative mental health outcomes and emotional wellbeing.
Within the context of providing guidance and support to the multitudes of young people within our complex and multidimensional world, a sole reliance on chaplains within a school setting to support the emotional wellbeing of students, schools and their communities is a tricky thing. Particularly when it comes to navigating conversations and pathways around sexuality, gender, equity and discrimination.
While there is still going to be this experience for some young people irrespective, removing the choice to provide non-religious support to our young people is a potentially life changing and life threatening mistake, and one that needs to be carefully put into place.